Legal Opinion

Lavery v. Gardner

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 17, 1925No. 15702PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

ESTES, C.

J. K. Gardner, cíe-fendant in error, had judgment against G. W. Lavery and D. P. Farrell for $750 dry hole money, under a written contract between the parties pertaining to the drilling of an oil and gas well in a certain section 23. Defendants admitted that they owed the plaintiff said sum, but sought to offset same, under their cross-petition, alleging, for the most part, by way of conclusions, that the parties sustained confidential business relations among themselves and were engaged in joint ventures and mining partnerships in drilling oil and gas wells and in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Woodworth v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Cobb v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  3. Nicholson Corporation v. FergusonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. First Bank of Texola v. TerrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  5. Hyde v. City of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Knapp v. First Nat. Bank & Trust Co. of Oklahoma CityCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1946
  2. Jones v. Sinclair Crude Oil Purchasing Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  3. Harris v. TuckerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  4. Fulton v. BaxterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
  5. Ewing v. OwensSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API