Legal Opinion

Farmers' State Bank v. Cox

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 24, 1914No. 3211PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from County Court, Stephens County; W. H. Admire, Judge. Action by J. E. Cox against the Farmers’ State Bank and A. S. Bennett. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HARRISON, C.

This was an action for possession of a promissory note for $200 held in escrow by the Farmers’ State Bank, the same having been executed by A. S. Bennett and placed in said bank by the plaintiff, J. E. Cox, and A. S. Bennett, against a $200 check executed by John E. Cox as a forfeit in the event of failure of a certain land deal between Cox and Bennett. The facts disclosed by the record are that Cox contracted to sell Bennett a certain 110-acre tract of land, agreeing to convey a perfect title, for the sum of $2,000. Cox was to execute a deed to Bennett,. and Bennett was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Grant v. MilamSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  2. Levy v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Harris Et Ux. v. ArthurSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Fox v. EasterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1900
  5. Crabtree v. Eufaula Cotton Seed Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hyde v. City of AltusSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Burford v. BridwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  3. Lavery v. GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
  4. Clay v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
  5. Taylor v. WalkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API