Legal Opinion
Royal Indemnity Co. v. Alexander Industries, Inc. Ex Rel. Berger Acoustical Co.
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided July 8, 1965No. 98PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CAREY, Justice.
The defendant below has appealed from a summary judgment entered against it in the Superior Court. The question presented is whether, under the language of a building contractor’s bond, a sub-contractor may recover from the surety.
Berger Acoustical Co., Inc. (Berger), as a sub-contractor, supplied certain labor and materials for the erection of buildings at Delaware City and Greenwood owned by Alexander Industries, Inc. (Alexander). Berger’s contract was with Construction Unlimited, Inc. (Construction), the general contractor. There is no dispute of fact. The contract between…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pennsylvania Supply Co. v. National Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
- Wilmington Housing Authority v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandSupreme Court of Delaware · 1946
- Gibbs v. Trinity Universal Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. Mill & Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Dravo-Doyle Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Oliver B. Cannon & Sons, Inc. v. Dorr-Oliver Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
- Pierce Associates, Inc. v. Nemours FoundationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988
- Insurance Co. of North America v. WaterhouseSuperior Court of Delaware · 1980
- Cretex Companies, Inc. v. Construction Leaders, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Amelco Window Corp. v. Fed. Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.