Legal Opinion

Dravo-Doyle Co. v. Royal Indemnity Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 25, 1952No. Appeal, 167PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Chidsey,

The lower court sustained preliminary objections to the plaintiff’s complaint in assumpsit and gave the plaintiff fifteen days in which to amend in order to allege that it had the right to a lien. Upon failure to amend, judgment was entered for the defendant. This appeal is from the entry of that judgment.

The question here involved is one of law and there is no dispute regarding the facts. Plaintiff, DravoDoyle Company, is an unpaid materialman. Defendant is a surety for a subcontractor which is now bankrupt.

Bechtel International Corporation, the general…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Pennsylvania Supply Co. v. National Casualty Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  3. Fleck-Atlantic Co. v. Indemnity Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Wyoming MacHinery Co. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Frommeyer v. L. & R. CONSTRUCTION CO.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1956
  3. Atlantic Refining Co. v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Alexander Industries, Inc. Ex Rel. Berger Acoustical Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  5. Knecht, Inc. v. United Pacific Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API