Wilmington Housing Authority v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
CAREY, J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
We are in accord with the conclusions of the Court below concerning the first two grounds of demurrer for the reasons given by that Court. It is unnecessary to repeat those reasons in full. As to the first ground, while the allegations could perhaps have been drawn with greater precision, the narr is sufficient. As to the second ground, a comparison of the language of the bond and that of the statute readily demonstrates that the bond is broader than the statute and includes claims for labor and materials supplied to a sub-contractor. If the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lawrence v. . FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Tidal Oil Co. v. FlanaganSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Commonwealth v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Greene County v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Johnson-Foster Co. v. D'Amore Construction Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Terry King and Valerie Jean BurdexCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Oliver B. Cannon & Sons, Inc. v. Dorr-Oliver Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
- United States v. McCoyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Summons v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1856
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.