Legal Opinion
Smith v. Aztec Well Servicing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 12, 2006No. 04-2153, 04-2168PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McCONNELL, Circuit Judge.
Aztec Well Servicing Company (“Aztec”) is a natural gas and oil well drilling company located in Aztec, New Mexico. The plaintiffs are present or former Aztec employees who worked on drilling rigs in the San Juan basin. They brought suit under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), claiming that their employer should be required to pay them for the time they spend traveling from Aztec to the drill sites' — some of them in remote locations hours away. The plaintiffs later sought to add FLSA claims related to work performed at their job site, but the district court held…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Minter v. Prime Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
- Robert H. E. Frank, Jerry D. Mooberry, Tyrone G. Moreno v. U.S. West, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
- Tennessee Coal, Iron & Railroad v. Muscoda Local No. 123Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- IBP, Inc. v. AlvarezSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Bonilla v. Baker Concrete Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- Husky Ventures, Inc. v. B55 Invs., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Cohen v. LongshoreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Singh v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Rutti v. Lojack Corp., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.