Legal Opinion

Dave Gustafson & Co. v. State

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1968No. File 10409PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANSON, Presiding Judge.

In this action by a contractor against the State of South Dakota and its Highway Commission the single question is whether a provision in a state highway construction contract is one for liquidated damages, as the trial court found, or is a penalty.

On October 5, 1963 plaintiff, Dave Gustafson & Company, entered into a contract with the State Highway Commission for the construction of the subbase, base and bituminous surfacing of a new public highway between Wessington Springs and Woonsocket. Plaintiff performed a total dollar amount of work in the amount of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Anderson v. Cactus Heights Country ClubSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Barnes v. ClementSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Seim v. KrauseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Utley v. DunningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Boone Coleman Construction, Inc. v. Village of PiketonOhio Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Fortune Bridge Co. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
  3. Hofer v. WM Scott Livestock CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Potter v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Silva & Hill Construction Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API