Dave Gustafson & Co. v. State
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
HANSON, Presiding Judge.
In this action by a contractor against the State of South Dakota and its Highway Commission the single question is whether a provision in a state highway construction contract is one for liquidated damages, as the trial court found, or is a penalty.
On October 5, 1963 plaintiff, Dave Gustafson & Company, entered into a contract with the State Highway Commission for the construction of the subbase, base and bituminous surfacing of a new public highway between Wessington Springs and Woonsocket. Plaintiff performed a total dollar amount of work in the amount of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Priebe & Sons, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Anderson v. Cactus Heights Country ClubSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1963
- Barnes v. ClementSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1899
- Seim v. KrauseSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1900
- Utley v. DunningSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Boone Coleman Construction, Inc. v. Village of PiketonOhio Supreme Court · 2016
- Fortune Bridge Co. v. Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- Hofer v. WM Scott Livestock CompanyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
- Potter v. AndersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
- Silva & Hill Construction Co. v. Employers Mutual Liability InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.