State v. Newsome
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for delivery of marijuana for consideration, ORS 475.860, and assigns error to the trial court’s admission into evidence of a state crime laboratory report identifying the substance as marijuana. Specifically, defendant argues that the admission of the state crime laboratory report was error because the report contained only a “bare conclusion that the material was marijuana” and did not identify the tests performed on the substance to confirm that it was marijuana. Defendant also raises a supplemental, and unpreserved, assignment of error, arguing…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. BirchfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. MaidenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. IdolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009