Legal Opinion

State v. Newsome

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 3, 2008No. 051136720; A131520PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for delivery of marijuana for consideration, ORS 475.860, and assigns error to the trial court’s admission into evidence of a state crime laboratory report identifying the substance as marijuana. Specifically, defendant argues that the admission of the state crime laboratory report was error because the report contained only a “bare conclusion that the material was marijuana” and did not identify the tests performed on the substance to confirm that it was marijuana. Defendant also raises a supplemental, and unpreserved, assignment of error, arguing…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. BirchfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. GibsonOregon Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. MaidenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  5. State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. WillisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  2. State v. IdolCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API