Legal Opinion

Denton v. City & County of San Francisco

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 27, 1953No. Civ. 15434PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDooling, J.

Respondent Denton was a conductor with the Market Street Railway when that utility was acquired by the city and county of San Francisco in 1944, his employment with the acquired utility having been continuous since 1915. When the city and county acquired the utility respondent was working on the No. 40 line and continued to work on the same line, thereafter. The cars on this line started their initial run from San Francisco and were returned to San Francisco at the conclusion of their final run but otherwise they were operated between Daly City and San Mateo in San Mateo County. Denton was at…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Mott v. HorstmannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Corcoran v. San Francisco City & County Employees Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kennedy v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
  2. Ector v. City of TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Williams v. Civil Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Eashman v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API