Legal Opinion
Williams v. Civil Service Commission
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided May 4, 1970No. Calendar 32, Docket 52,385PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAdams, J.
I. Facts and Proceedings
On May 19, 1964, plaintiffs petitioned defendant Civil Service Commission for a hearing, alleging that Rule VII promulgated by the commission was illegal because it interfered with the right of city employees to live where they wanted, had no relationship to the performance of their work, was not authorized by the city charter and violated provisions of state and federal constitutions.
A hearing was held on October 27,1964. Plaintiffs offered no testimony. A stipulation of facts was submitted and entered. The stipulation provided:
“All of the petitioners * * * are…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Kennedy v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Cook Coffee Co. v. Village of FlushingMichigan Supreme Court · 1934
- Brooks v. ManganMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Chaddock v. DayMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- Salt Lake City Fire Fighters Local 1645 v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Ector v. City of TorranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Dearborn Fire Fighters Union Local No 412 v. City of DearbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1975
- Harvey Firemen's Ass'n v. City of HarveyIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
- Terry S. Wardwell v. The Board of Education of the City School District of the City of CincinnatiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
- Wexford County Prosecutor v. PrangerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.