Legal Opinion
Eashman v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 18, 1960No. Civ. No. 18539PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULSEN, J. pro tem.*
On January 20, 1948, Willie Eashman, respondent-petitioner, entered the employ of the San Francisco Municipal Railway and later was given the civil service classification “J66 Garageman—Permanent.” That employment continued until April 5, 1957. Shortly after that date petitioner was served with a notice of hearing which stated: “You are charged with inattention to duties in that you were working on your own personal automobile during regular working hours.” Following a hearing before the Manager of Utilities that officer filed an order of dismissal of the accused. This…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Richter v. WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Cason v. Glass Bottle Blowers Assn.California Supreme Court · 1951
- Fascination, Inc. v. HooverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
- La Prade v. Department of Water & PowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- English v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Big Rock Mesas Property Owners Ass'n v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Borders v. AndersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Smith v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970