Grivois v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
NEBEKER, Chief Judge:
On June 23, 1994, the appellant’s counsel lodged with the Court his application for attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA). Pub.L. No. 99-80, 99 Stat. 183, 185 (1985) (codified at 28 U.S.C. § 2412), as amended, by Pub.L. No. 102-572, tit. V, § 506, 106 Stat. 4506, 4513 (1992). The Court, on July 18, 1994, ordered the appellant to show cause why the application should be deemed timely. An untimely response was received on August 22, 1994. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will dismiss the fee application as untimely.
*101Pursuant to…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ruckelshaus v. Sierra ClubSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Ardestani v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Myers v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
- Welter v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Bazalo v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
- Similes v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- Strouth v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
- Darald G. Bly v. Robert A. McDonaldUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2016
- Hudson v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.