Legal Opinion
Bazalo v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
Decided August 16, 1996No. Nos. 93-660, 94-49 and 92-1260PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IVERS, Judge, filed the opinion of the Court. STEINBERG, Judge, filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part.
IVERS, Judge:
These cases are before the Court on the appellants’ applications for award of reasonable attorney fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Because the three eases present a common question, we decide them in a single opinion. The issue presented in these cases is whether an appellant may correct a timely, but defective, EAJA application (i.e. one which fails to meet each of the jurisdictional requirements set forth in…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Shalala v. SchaeferSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Texas State Teachers Ass'n v. Garland Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Library of Congress v. ShawSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Locher v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1996
- Sumner v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
- Cullens v. GoberUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
- Chesser v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1998
- Thayer v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2001
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.