Legal Opinion
Myers v. Sullivan
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided November 6, 1990No. Nos. 89-3533, 89-3550, 89-3576 and 89-3661PublishedCited by 203 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:
These consolidated cases involve the question of when a claimant who obtains full benefits from the Secretary of Health and Human Services subsequent to a district court remand must file a petition for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act,1 (“EAJA”).2 In each of the four cases before us, the claimant applied for either Social Security disability benefits, Supplemental Security Income, or both, and was denied benefits by the Secretary of Health and Human Services (hereinafter “the Secretary”). Each claimant then initiated judicial review of the…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by203 opinions
- Judy K. Powers v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
- Hoa Hong Van v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- OFS FITEL, LLC v. Epstein, Becker and Green, PCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Pierce v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.