Schwab Safe & Lock Co. v. Snow
Utah Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Third District; Hon. F. G. Loofbourow, Judge. Action by Schwab Safe & Lock Company against O. C. Snow. Judgment for defendant on his counterclaim. Plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.
The plaintiff sued the defendant to recover an alleged balance due “for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered” to him. The case was here before on the defendant’s appeal. The dismissal of his counterclaim was held erroneous, and the case was remanded for a new trial. Schwab Safe & Loch Co. v. Snow, 44 Utah 341, 140 Pac. 761. A new . trial was accordingly had to the court without a jury, and the court entered judgment for the plaintiff on the balance agreed to be due it, and also made findings of fact and conclusions of law in favor of the defendant on his several counterclaims and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Guetzkow Bros. v. A. H. Andrews & Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- McKay v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
- Rose v. FoordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Davey v. First Nat. Bank of DeadwoodSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Anglo-California Trust Co. v. HallUtah Supreme Court · 1922
- Smith v. Washburn-Wilson Seed Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1934
- O'Donnell v. ParkerUtah Supreme Court · 1916
- Juniper Lumber Co. v. John M. Nelson, Jr., Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Hurlbut v. Butte-Kansas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1926
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.