Legal Opinion

Hurlbut v. Butte-Kansas Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 6, 1926No. 26,197PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action for rent. It was tried to the court. Judgment was rendered for defendant, and plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff owned forty acres of land upon which he executed a mining lease, which was assigned by the lessee to defendant, who operated a mine upon the land. On this was a four-acre tract upon which was situated a house, barn and other farm improvements. Defendant desired the use of this four-acre tract and the improvements thereon as a residence for its mine superintendent in order for him to live near the mine and more…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Alsens American Portland Cement Works v. Degnon Contracting Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
  2. Clark v. DyeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Richmond Leather Manufacturing Co. v. FawcettSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
  4. Propst v. William Hanley Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Schwab Safe & Lock Co. v. SnowUtah Supreme Court · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Crestview Bowl, Inc. v. Womer Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. Julian v. GoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Patrons Mutual Insurance v. Union Gas System, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. Law Co., Inc. v. Mohawk Const. & Supply Co.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010
  5. Johnson v. DumondSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API