Legal Opinion
State v. Scott
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 16, 1903No. 4668PublishedCited by 8 opinions
Appeal from Superior Court, King County. Hon. Arthur E. Grieein, Judge.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fullerton, C. J.
The appellant was convicted of the crime of rape, and appeals from the judgment and sentence pronounced against him. The act (Laws 1897, p. 19) under which he was convicted reads as follows:
“An Act amending section 28 of the Penal Code of the State of Washington, relating to the crime of rape.
“Be it enacted by the Legislature of the State of Washington :
“Section 1. That section 28 of the Penal Code of the State of Washington, relating to the crime of rape, be amended to read as follows: Sec. 28. A person shall be deemed guilty of rape…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Marston v. HumesWashington Supreme Court · 1891
- State ex rel. Seattle Electric Co. v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Copland v. PirieWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Mankin v. Pennsylvania Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by8 opinions
- State ex rel. Zent v. NicholsWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- State ex rel. Lindsey v. DerbyshireWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Noble v. BragawIdaho Supreme Court · 1906
- In Re HuletWashington Supreme Court · 1930
- In re DonnellanWashington Supreme Court · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.