Legal Opinion
Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 25, 2003No. 98-789 TPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HEWITT, Judge.
Before the court is defendant’s Motion for Reconsideration (Def.’s Mot. or defendant’s Motion). In its Motion, defendant asks the court to reconsider its opinion filed on February 20, 2003. See Pac. Gas & Elec. Co. v. United States, 55 Fed.Cl. 271 (2003). For the following reasons, defendant’s Motion is GRANTED.
I. Standard for a Motion for Reconsideration
Defendant seeks reconsideration pursuant to Rule 59 of the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). Rule 59 provides that:
[Reconsideration may be granted to all or any of the parties and on all or part of the issues,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lewis v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Bishop v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
- Principal Mutual Life Insurance v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Matthews v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Prati v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2008
- Corrigan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Alpha I, L.P. ex rel. Sands v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Alpha I, L.P. ex rel. Sands v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.