Legal Opinion
Prati v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 1, 2008No. 02-60TPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
LAWRENCE J. BLOCK, Judge.
I. Introduction
Plaintiffs move under Rule 59 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”), for reconsideration of this Court’s April 16, 2008 opinion in Prati v. United States, 81 Fed.Cl. 422 (2008), dismissing the claims of plaintiffs Ronald C. and Mary G. Prati and 76 other similar AMCOR cases for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. Pls.’s Mot. for Reconsideration, April 30, 2008 [Docket #89], At the May 2, 2007 oral argument on the defendant’s motion to dismiss and the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, the parties…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Fru-Con Construction Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Texaco Inc. v. Pennzoil Company, State of Texas, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Martin v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Global Computer Enterprises, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Information Sciences Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Strategic Housing Finance Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Starr International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.