Seaboard Air Line Railroad v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.
Is Seaboard entitled as a matter of right, upon the facts established, to use the turnout from Bridge Company trackage at Power Plant Junction to serve the power plant and so compete with Coast Line, notwithstanding Coast Line has no need or desire to make joint use thereof and notwithstanding its refusal to consent to the construction and use thereof by Seaboard ? If it has such legal right, Seaboard will suffer irreparable injury unless Coast Line is enjoined from wrongful interference with Seaboard’s exercise of such legal right; for such equitable relief alone will afford Seaboard a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Minneapolis Civic & Commerce Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. Des Moines Union Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Great Lakes & St. Lawrence Transp. Co. v. Scranton Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1917
- Chicago & C. Ry. v. DES MOINES & C. RYSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Norman v. Nash Johnson & Sons' Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
- Eaton v. GrubbsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
- Loy v. Lorm Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Fulton v. TalbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- In Re Marriage of ImperatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.