Legal Opinion

Chicago & C. Ry. v. DES MOINES & C. RY

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 6, 1920No. Nos. 66, 67PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court 1

254 U.S. 196 (1920)

CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.

v.

DES MOINES UNION RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.

DES MOINES UNION RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.

v.

CHICAGO, MILWAUKEE & ST. PAUL RAILWAY COMPANY ET AL.

Nos. 66, 67.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued March 23, 24, 1920.

Decided December 6, 1920.

CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT.

Mr. Robert J. Cary and Mr. Burton Hanson, with whom Mr. John C. Cook, Mr. Winslow S. Pierce, Mr. Lawrence Greer and Mr. F.C. Nicodemus, Jr., were on the briefs, for Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co. et al.

Mr. James L. Parrish and…

Also in this document: Opinion of the Court · Pitney.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Colton v. ColtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Snell v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Philippine Sugar Estates Development Co. v. Government of the Philippine IslandsSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. Griswold v. HazardSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  5. Utermehle v. NormentSupreme Court of the United States · 1905

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Burns v. BastienSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Bishop v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
  3. Wabash Ry. Co. v. American Refrigerator Transit Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
  4. Portland Cremation Ass'n v. COMMISSIONER, INTERNAL REVENUECourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  5. Howard v. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1932

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API