Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Imperato

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 19, 1975No. Civ. 44332PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

HASTINGS, J.

Statement of Facts

Louis J. Imperato (husband), appellant, and Diana L. Imperato (wife), respondent, were married on June 27, 1959, in Phoenix, Arizona. They subsequently moved to California where they lived together with their two minor children until December 30, 1971, when they separated. The children stayed with husband.

On July 10, 1969, Personalized Data Delivery Service (PDD) was incorporated. It specialized in data processing delivery. The corporation was actually an extension of a partnership between husband and his father, with husband becoming the sole shareholder,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. In Re Marriage of LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Van Camp v. Van CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Estate of NeilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Beam v. Bank of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of AufmuthCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  2. In Re Marriage of HugCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  3. In Re Marriage of DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. In Re Marriage of FreibergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
  5. In Re Marriage of AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API