Legal Opinion

Windham v. Riddle

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided August 7, 2006No. 4145Published

1Opinion of the Court

370 S.C. 415 (2006)

635 S.E.2d 558

Dorothy WINDHAM, Appellant

v.

Donald Allen RIDDLE and Jennifer D. Riddle, Respondents.

No. 4145.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Heard March 7, 2006.

Decided August 7, 2006.

Rehearing Denied September 25, 2006.

Clinch K. Belser, Jr., Michael J. Polk and H. Freeman Belser, all of Columbia, for Appellant.

Edgar W. Dickson, of Orangeburg, for Respondents.

HUFF, J.:

In this property dispute, Dorothy Windham appeals the master-in-equity's finding that Donald and Jennifer Riddle (the Riddles) had an appurtenant easement for irrigation purposes over property owned by…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Tupper v. Dorchester CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1997
  3. Jowers v. HornsbySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  4. Lewis v. Premium Investment Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  5. Smith v. Commissioners of Public WorksCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API