Legal Opinion
Republic Insurance v. Pat Dinardo Auto Sales, Inc.
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided February 23, 1995No. File CV930300662SPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLevin, J.
This is an action to recover monetary damages under an indemnity agreement. On September 25, 1978, the plaintiff, Republic Insurance Company, and the defendants, Pat DiNardo Auto Sales, Inc., Patrick M. DiNardo, Julia DiNardo and Salvatore J. DiNardo, entered into an indemnity agreement. The agreement provided in part that the defendants would indemnify the plaintiff “from and against any and all liability, loss, costs, damages, attorney’s fees and expenses of whatever kind or nature which [the plaintiff] may sustain or incur by reason or in consequence of executing any such bond or bonds as…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Fleischmann Distilling Corp. v. Maier Brewing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Normand Josef Enterprises, Inc. v. Connecticut National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Nova Research, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Dowling v. Finley Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Hyman v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2001
- FIRST INDEM. INS. CO. v. KemenashNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Republic Insurance v. Pat Dinardo Auto Sales, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1996
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.