Legal Opinion
Burritt Mutual Savings Bank of New Britain v. Tucker
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided April 7, 1981PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShka, J.
The named defendant 1 has appealed from a judgment of strict foreclosure of a mortgage upon an apartment building which he owned and also from two contempt orders ancillary to the foreclosure proceeding. A plethora of issues has been raised which may conveniently be classified into those relating to the rendition of the foreclosure judgment and those relating to the findings of contempt.
I
The defendant has attacked the judgment of strict foreclosure on several grounds: (1) that he was improperly defaulted for failure to plead; (2) that the finding of the amount of the mortgage debt was…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Penfield Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Kellems v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Snow v. CaliseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- State v. JacksonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. CorchadoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Hartford Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. TuckerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. PackardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
- Verrastro v. SivertsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Roche v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.