Legal Opinion

Harjo v. Chilcoat

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided November 18, 1930No. 19848PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIFFENDAFFER, C.

Two of the defendants in error, AValter D. Chilcoat and Harry H. Diamond, hereinafter referred to as plaintiffs, commenced this action in the district court of Seminole county, against, Benny Harjo, Lownie Harjo, Maggie Harjo, Homer Neece, the Texas Company, the Continental Oil Company, Amerada Petroleum Company, and the Marland Oil Company of Oklahoma, to quiet their title to a certain tract of land, and cancel of record a certain attorney’s contract between the defendants Harjo and Homer Neece, which plaintiffs claimed was a cloud upon their title. The land involved is what…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Title Guaranty & Surety Co. v. SlinkerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  2. Carr v. FifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Warner v. ColemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Moschos v. BaylessSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  5. Grace v. HildebrandtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Miller's EstateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  2. Vilardo v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  3. Beauregard v. DaileyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1936
  4. Newbern v. FarrisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
  5. Abrams v. NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API