Conklin v. Newton
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge,
(after stating the facts as above). It is contended on behalf of the collector that he *613cannot be held personally liable for tbe delivery of the pimentoes, because the acts, whether wrongful or not, were committed by his subordinates, and not by himself. In defiling with this, as with all matters in this ease, we are limited to the judgment roll, as the record contains no bill of exceptions. In other words, we have nothing to consider except whether the complaint states a cause of action and the judgment conforms to the pleadings and the findings of the court.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- De Lima v. BidwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Robertson v. SichelSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Redmond v. Liverpool, New York & Philadelphia Steamboat Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Giles v. NewtonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1927
- United States v. Massachusetts Bonding & InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dioguardi v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Truth Seeker Co. v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Nakasheff v. Continental Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
- Lafontan v. EltingDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1931
- Singleton v. Searail Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.