Legal Opinion
United States v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 4, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Kapper, J.:
The action is brought to recover for the loss of a case of fine watches shipped from France to New York. The claim was assigned to Lemuel S. Matthews, whose name appears in the title as the relator. It is asserted that the appellant P. H. Keahon, Inc., caused or suffered the loss and that it and the appellant bonding company should respond to plaintiff therefor. P. H. Keahon, Inc., was under contract with the United States government to cart all packages and articles imported into the United States and landed at the port of New York, from the ships to the appraisers’ warehouse in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ball v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Schillinger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Claflin v. . MeyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Fosmire v. . National Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
- Howard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Conklin v. NewtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
- Giles v. NewtonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1927
- United States ex rel. Brimberg Bros. v. Globe Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- United States v. United States Lines Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1938
- Textile Alliance, Inc. v. P. H. Keahon, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1925