Legal Opinion

Singleton v. Searail Industries, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided December 4, 1987No. Civ. A. No. 87-0123-AHPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

HOWARD, District Judge.

This cause is before the Court on a motion to dismiss filed by defendants Searail Industries and Baldwin Warehouses, Inc. (“movants”). Movants urge that this Court has no subject matter jurisdiction over this action. Alternatively, movants argue that the only possible basis of subject matter jurisdiction over them derives from the principle of pendent party jurisdiction, which they contend does not apply in the circumstances of this case.

I. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION

This action was originally filed in the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. Customs officers…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Bell v. HoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Illinois v. City of MilwaukeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Wheeldin v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Twigg v. Hercules CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Twigg v. Hercules CorporationWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API