Legal Opinion
Cresta Bella v. Poway Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 31, 2013No. D060789PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HALLER, J.
Poway Unified School District (the District) imposed school impact fees on Cresta Bella, LP (Cresta Bella), for a residential development project involving the demolition of an existing apartment complex and construction of a new, larger apartment complex. Cresta Bella petitioned for writ of mandate in superior court seeking a partial refund of the fees based on a claim that it was improperly charged for the entire square footage of the new apartment complex, rather than only for the increased square footage created by the development. On the same grounds, it also alleged an…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Garrick Development Co. v. Hayward Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Warmington Old Town Associates, L.P. v. Tustin Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- HOME BUILDERS ASSN. OF TULARE/KINGS COUNTIES, INC. v. City of LemooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- T.P. v. T.W.California Court of Appeal · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Walker v. City of San ClementeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- 616 Croft Ave., LLC v. City of West HollywoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Tanimura & Antle Fresh Foods, Inc. v. Salinas Union High Sch. Dist., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
- AMCAL Chico LLC v. Chico Unified School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2020
- City of San Marcos v. Loma San MarcosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.