Garrick Development Co. v. Hayward Unified School District
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SMITH, J.
Plaintiff developers of residential property appeal from an order, in consolidated cases, denying them a petition for writ of mandate by which they sought the return of school facilities fees they had paid under protest (Gov. Code, former §§ 65913.5 and 66008 (now § 66020)) as conditions to obtaining building permits. 1 They urge that defendants Hayward Unified School District (HUSD or the district) and its governing board of education (the board) imposed the fees in violation of statutory requirements and constitutional limitations. We affirm.
Background
The fees in this case…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Candid Enterprises, Inc. v. Grossmont Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Shapell Industries, Inc. v. Governing BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Paterno v. StateCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Ehrlich v. City of Culver CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Keyes v. BowenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Colores v. Board of Trustees of the California State UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- City of Dublin v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.