Legal Opinion
Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Anaya
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided June 5, 1967No. 8223PublishedCited by 66 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOOD, Judge, Court of Appeals.
Questions are presented concerning (1) rescission of an insurance policy and (2) court costs.
Husband applied to plaintiff for a policy of medical expense insurance to cover himself, his wife and two minor daughters. By this application husband would have been the insured. Plaintiff experienced difficulty in obtaining medical information concerning the husband. Because of this delay, it prepared a policy naming the wife as the insured and covering the children. After husband and wife signed an endorsement authorizing an amendment to the application for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Vail v. . ReynoldsNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Sauter v. St. Michael's CollegeNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1962
- Modisette v. Foundation Reserve Insurance Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
- Kemart Corporation, a Corporation v. Printing Arts Research Laboratories, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
- Tsosie v. Foundation Reserve Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1967
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by66 opinions
- Kelly Inn No. 102, Inc. v. KapnisonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- United Nuclear Corp. v. General Atomic Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1980
- Azar v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Duke City Lumber Company, Inc. v. TerrelNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Ledbetter v. WebbNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1985
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.