Legal Opinion

Estate of Dutard v. Bank of California

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1905No. S.F. No. 3858PublishedCited by 49 opinions

APPEAL from a decree of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco making a partial distribution of the estate of a deceased person. J. Y. Coffey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This is an appeal from a decree of partial distribution, whereby certain ranch property situated in Santa Barbara County, with the livestock and other personal property thereon, all appraised at $163,881, was distributed to Eliza Dutard, the surviving wife and sole devisee and legatee of the deceased. The appellants are the same persons who were parties plaintiff in the case of Kleinclaus v. Dutard, ante, p. 245, [81 Pac. 516], in which the judgment of the superior court in favor of the defendants therein has been this day affirmed. Plaintiffs presented written objections to the granting of…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Kleinclaus v. DutardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Elizalde v. ElizaldeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. McGrath v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Lichtenberg v. McGlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Bewick v. MechamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Davis v. ShepardWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Estate of ArmsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API