Legal Opinion

In Re Bowen III

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 1994No. Supreme Court No. SB-93-0051-D. Disciplinary Commission Nos. 88-1821, 89-1466 and 90-0726PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Vice Chief Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

This is a State Bar disciplinary proceeding. The Hearing Committee and Disciplinary Commission recommended that respondent be suspended for one year. Respondent timely appealed. We have jurisdiction pursuant to Ariz.R.Sup.Ct. 46(a).

FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

This disciplinary proceeding concerns the conduct of respondent, Ted Butcher Bowen, an attorney since 1966, in two unrelated matters. We discuss each matter separately.

I. Clients A and B

In September 1983 and thereafter, respondent represented A and B regarding their claims…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, PappasArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Matter of LevineArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  3. James, Cooke & Hobson, Inc. v. Lake Havasu Plumbing & Fire ProtectionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993
  4. In Re a Member of the State Bar of Arizona, FioramontiArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Matter of GaynesArizona Supreme Court · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of StruthersArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. In Re ZawadaArizona Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In Re AbramsArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  4. In re CarrascoArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  5. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API