In re Carrasco

OPINION

FELDMAN, Chief Justice.

This matter came before the court on the recommendation of the Disciplinary Commission (“Commission”) that Daniel Carrasco, Jr. (“Respondent”) be suspended for a period of three months, the suspension to be served consecutively to a six-month suspension previously imposed on Respondent. Although Respondent did not appeal the present recommendation, we accepted sua sponte review pursuant to Ariz.R.Sup.Ct. 53(e)(1). We have jurisdiction under Ariz.R.Sup.Ct. 46(a) and 53(e) (hereinafter “Rule”).

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

A client complained to the State Bar,…