Legal Opinion
Foster v. Britton
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 1, 2015No. A139892PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RIVERA, J.
State law provides that a landlord may change the terms of a month-to-month lease after giving 30 days’ notice and that the new terms become part of the lease if the tenant continues to hold the premises after the notice takes effect. (Civ. Code, 1 § 827, subd. (a).) A regulation promulgated by San Francisco’s Rent Board provides that notwithstanding any changes to the terms of a tenancy under section 827, a tenant may not be evicted for violating an obligation that was not included in the tenant’s original rental agreement unless the change is authorized by San Francisco’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- Neary v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Goehring v. Chapman UniversityCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Bravo Vending v. City of Rancho MirageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Boston LLC v. JuarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Apartment Assn. of Los Angeles etc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2026
- DeLisi v. LamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019
- Environmental Health Advocates, Inc. v. Pancho Villa's, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2026
- Frazier v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.