Legal Opinion

Hutton v. Watters

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1915PublishedCited by 57 opinions

FROM WEAKLEY. Appeal from the Circuit Court of Weakley County to the Court of Civil Appeals, and by certiorari from the Court of Civil Appeals to the Supreme Court.— Jos. E. Jones, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Neil

The averments of the declaration are, in substance, as follows:

One of the defendants, the Hall-Moody Institute, is a chartered institution of learning at Martin, Tennessee. Defendant Watters is its president, and the ten other defendants- are its “directors, trustees, teachers, and advisors.” The school has a large out of town patronage, and it is essential that boarding houses be conducted to accommodate these students, as well as some of the teachers. Mrs. Hutton is a widow who makes a business of keeping boarders. In June, 1910, she opened a business of the kind in Martin. During that year…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  2. Delz v. Winfree, Norman & PearsonTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Transportation Co. v. Standard Oil Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Dunshee v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  5. Huskie v. GriffinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1909

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Trau-Med of America, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  4. Brockmeyer v. Dun & BradstreetWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Magnan v. Anaconda Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API