Delz v. Winfree, Norman & Pearson
Texas Supreme Court
Error from Galveston. Tried below before Hon. Wm. H. Stewart. A general demurrer was sustained in the court below to the petition. The only question brought up is its sufficiency.
1Opinion of the Court
HENRY, Associate Justice.
This suit was brought to recover damages by Bernard Delz against the members of the firm of Winfree, Borman & Pearson, and the members of the firm of Borden & Borden-
Plaintiff’s petition stated his cause of action as follows: That he was pursuing the occupation of a butcher in the city of Galveston, and was making and would have continued to make large profits and gains in the business but for the grievances committed by the defendants as alleged; that in the prosecution of his business he had opened and was conducting two butcher shops in said city for the sale of…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kimball v. HarmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1871
3Cited by78 opinions
- Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. v. SturgesTexas Supreme Court · 2001
- International Bankers Life Insurance Co. v. HollowayTexas Supreme Court · 1963
- Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Berry v. DonovanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
- Southern Railway Co. v. ChambersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.