Legal Opinion

Brockmeyer v. Dun & Bradstreet

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1983No. 81-2024PublishedCited by 269 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinmetz, J.

The principal issue on appeal is whether Wisconsin has any judicial exceptions to the employment at will doctrine.1 We hold that in certain limited circumstances as discussed below, there are exceptions.

I

This is a review of the court of appeals decision reversing the circuit court for Milwaukee county, the Honorable Ralph G. Gorenstein. The plaintiff, Charles J. Brockmeyer, began his employment with Dun & Brad*564street in August, 1969, as a business analyst trainee. From June, 1977, until his termination in May, 1980, he held a management position as district manager of the credit services…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Murphy v. American Home Products Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Palmateer v. International Harvester Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Geary v. United States Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by269 opinions

  1. Flesner v. Technical Communications Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  2. Foley v. Interactive Data Corp.California Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Thompson v. St. Regis Paper CompanyWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Burk v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989

264 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API