Legal Opinion

Garrison v. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 8, 1930No. 3931PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWillson, C. J.

(after stating the case as above).

Appellant insists it appeared the jury were guilty of misconduct entitling him to have the, judgment set aside, and that the court below therefore erred when he overruled his motion for a new trial on that ground.

Special issues were submitted to the jury and they were instructed to answer same from a preponderance of the evidence, without regard to the effect their answers might have upon the judgment to be rendered in the case. The misconduct charged was that the jury ignored the instruction and before considering the issues took a vote upon a question they…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. McFaddin v. HebertTexas Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Rosenthal Dry Goods Co. v. HillebrandtTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  3. Electric Express & Baggage Co. v. AblonTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Gulf, C. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. HarveyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  5. Seale v. SchultzCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Miller v. Fenner, Beane & UngerleiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Hardwicke v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. GarrisonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  4. Brinker v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Hardwicke v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API