Hardwicke v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion
On Rehearing.
Appellees in their motion for rehearing ably contend that we have erred in many different respects in our disposition of this appeal. The argument upon most of the points made leaves us unconvinced.
Whatever would have been the effect of the judgment in the suit by the Hardwickes against Dr. Enloe as concluding a controversy between the appellants and appellees herein, had ap-pellee Universal Automobile Insurance Company never been sought to be held as a party in that suit, we think certainly the contention cannot be sound that after the insurance company successfully urged a plea…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Fuqua, Hinkle & Davis v. Pabst Brewing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
- Rosenthal Dry Goods Co. v. HillebrandtTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
- Johnson v. Breckenridge-Stephens Title Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
- Miller v. Fenner, Beane & UngerleiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.