Legal Opinion

Hardwicke v. Trinity Universal Ins. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 20, 1935No. 1482Published

1Opinion

On Rehearing.

Appellees in their motion for rehearing ably contend that we have erred in many different respects in our disposition of this appeal. The argument upon most of the points made leaves us unconvinced.

Whatever would have been the effect of the judgment in the suit by the Hardwickes against Dr. Enloe as concluding a controversy between the appellants and appellees herein, had ap-pellee Universal Automobile Insurance Company never been sought to be held as a party in that suit, we think certainly the contention cannot be sound that after the insurance company successfully urged a plea…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Fire Ins. Assn., Ltd. v. WickhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Fuqua, Hinkle & Davis v. Pabst Brewing Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Rosenthal Dry Goods Co. v. HillebrandtTexas Commission of Appeals · 1928
  4. Johnson v. Breckenridge-Stephens Title Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  5. Miller v. Fenner, Beane & UngerleiderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API