Legal Opinion

Rosenthal Dry Goods Co. v. Hillebrandt

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided June 13, 1928No. 935-5037PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpeer, J.

Eliza Hillebrandt sued Rosen-thal Dry Goods Company to recover damages for personal injuries received through the alleged negligence of the defendant’s truck driver causing a collision with a buggy in which she was riding. The plaintiff recovered a judgment upon verdict for $5,000, and the Court of Civil Appeals affirmed that judgment. 299 S. W. 665.

No further statement of the case is needed to make clear the questions presented in the application for writ of error by the dry goods company.

First, it is assigned:

“The district court submitted to the jury the question as to whether the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WashingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Gulf, Texas & Western Railway Co. v. DickeyTexas Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Russell v. BaileyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Gonzales v. FloresCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  5. Rosenthal Dry Goods Co. v. HillebrandtCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Wright v. Traders & General InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Hicks v. BrownTexas Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. DardenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1931
  4. American Employers' Ins. Co. v. SingletonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1930
  5. Jolley v. ClemensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API