Legal Opinion

Cooperstein v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 18, 1992No. 02120PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge:

This is an appeal from an order granting appellees’ motion for summary judgment. Upon review of the record, oral argument and briefs, we find that the trial court did not err. We affirm.

The facts found by the trial court are as follows:

[Appellants] are Richard Cooperstein, Executor of the Estate of Elsie Cooperstein and Ruth Gomeau, Administratrix of the Estate of Anne Nathan. [Appellees] are Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company and Jack Cooperstein.

On October 18,1985, Jack Cooperstein negligently operated his automobile, resulting in a collision with an automobile operated by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Krause v. Great Lakes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Newkirk v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Marroquin v. Mutual Benefit InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  5. Sturkie v. Erie Insurance GroupSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. William Cosenza Angelina C. Cosenza, H/w Patsy Dezii William Cosenza Angelina C. Cosenza, Patsy DeziiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
  2. Holmes v. Lankenau HospitalSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Bowersox v. Progressive Casualty InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  4. Estate of O'Connell ex rel. O'Connell v. Progressive Insurance Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Sherwood v. Bankers Standard InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API