Legal Opinion

Bowersox v. Progressive Casualty Insurance

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 3, 2001PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, J.:

¶ 1 The administrators of the estate of Paul S. Bowersox (the “Administrators”) appeal the trial court’s denial of relief following a determination by a board of arbitrators that Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (“Progressive”) 1 is not obligated to pay underinsured motorists benefits under the circumstances of this case. We affirm.

¶ 2 The facts of this case are undisputed. The Administrators brought this suit against Progressive for underinsured motorist coverage. Tragically, Bowersox was killed in a car accident involving three cars. At the time of the accident, he was the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Hutchison v. Sunbeam Coal Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. Johnston the Florist, Inc. v. TEDCO Construction Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Accurso v. Infra-Red Services, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Co. v. BlackSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Rudloff v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  4. TIG Insurance v. Tyco International Ltd.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
  5. Racicot v. Erie Insurance ExchangeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API