Legal Opinion
Sherwood v. Bankers Standard Insurance
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Decided March 12, 1993No. 00239PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUDOCK, Judge:
A single issue is presented for our review: Did the court below err in entering summary judgment on the basis that the family car exclusion contained in the policies issued by Appellee State Farm Insurance Company (State Farm) barred Appellant Paul Sherwood (Paul) from recovering first-party underinsured benefits under the facts of this case? We reverse.
This is an insurance dispute arising out of an automobile accident in which Paul was seriously injured while a passenger in his own car. James Collum (Collum) was driving the car; his negligence was the cause of the accident.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Wolgemuth v. Harleysville Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Kelly v. Nationwide InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- American Motorist Insurance Co. v. SarvelaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Newkirk v. United Services Automobile Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Marroquin v. Mutual Benefit InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Paylor v. Hartford Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Electric Insurance Company v. Nathan Rubin Patricia Rubin. Patricia Rubin v. Nathan Rubin Electric Insurance Company, Patricia Rubin and Nathan RubinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company v. Pamela RileyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Sherwood v. Bankers Standard InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Sherwood v. Bankers Standard Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.