Legal Opinion

Holmes v. Lankenau Hospital

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 2, 1993No. 03039PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPOVICH, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order granting appellees’ motions for summary judgment. We find that the trial court did not err in granting summary judgment. Accordingly, we affirm.

*456The facts of the present case are as follows: Appellants, Gail Holmes and Terri Hyden, filed a medical malpractice suit against appellees, Lankenau Hospital, Dr. Johnson, Dr. Russell, Dr. Kerr, Dr. Richter and Dr. Fine. Appellants alleged that appellees negligently treated their father, Phillip Johnson, at Lankenau Hospital.

On February 4, 1984, Phillip Johnson fell in the home of Reuben and Girdell…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Buttermore v. Aliquippa HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Spain v. VicenteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Hasselrode v. GnageySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  4. Pomerantz v. GoldsteinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. McKay v. BeattySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Cochran v. GAF Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Blumenstock v. GibsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  3. Goldey v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Baumgart v. Keene Building Products Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Felix v. Giuseppe Kitchens & Baths, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API