Legal Opinion
Siecko v. Amerada Hess Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 29, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-2088PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
BECHTLE, District Judge.
This is an action brought by Darryl Billemeyer, a franchisee-lessee gasoline dealer, against Amerada Hess Corporation (“Hess”), his franchisor-lessor, under the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2801, et seq. (“PMPA”). Billemeyer also asserts a state law claim for breach of fiduciary duty. The complaint is based upon a new Dealer Agreement which Hess required Billemeyer to execute in August, 1981, resulting in an increase in Billemeyer’s rent on his gasoline station. Presently before the Court is Hess’ motion for summary judgment. For the reasons…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Leon Thompson v. Kerr-Mcgee Refining CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1981
- Munno v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
- Meyer v. Amerada Hess Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1982
- Ferriola v. Gulf Oil Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Glenside West Corp. v. Exxon Co., USADistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1991
- Unocal Corp. v. KaabipourCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Bill Sandlin v. Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Southern Nevada Shell Dealers Ass'n v. Shell Oil Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1989
- Lippo v. Mobil Oil Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.