Legal Opinion
Southern Nevada Shell Dealers Ass'n v. Shell Oil Co.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided September 11, 1989No. S-85-910-RDFPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING ARCO’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART SHELL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ROGER D. FOLEY, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the defendants’ Motions for Summary Judgment. For the following reasons, Atlantic Richfield Company’s motion is granted and Shell Oil Company’s motion is granted in part and denied in part.
1. Facts
The two remaining plaintiffs 1 are former franchisees of Shell Oil Company (Shell) who operated retail service stations for Shell before Shell purportedly withdrew from the Las Vegas gasoline retail…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- William C. Brach, Cross-Appellant v. Amoco Oil Company, a Maryland Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Ewing v. Amoco Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Unocal Corp. v. KaabipourCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Conoco Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Adidas-America, Inc. v. Payless Shoesource, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2008
- Adidas America, Inc. v. Payless Shoesource, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 2007
- Employers Insurance of Wausau v. BrownerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.