Legal Opinion

People v. Yates

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 2, 1998No. 97SA467Published

1Per curiam

This lawyer discipline case comes to us on a stipulation, agreement and conditional admission of misconduct. See C.R.C.P. 241.18. The conditional admission recommended that the respondent be publicly censured for failing to obtain his law firm’s approval for a fee credit arrangement. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission. We accept the conditional admission and publicly censure the respondent.

I

The respondent was admitted to the Colorado bar in 1971. The conditional admission provides that the respondent joined the law firm of Patton…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. DohertySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. People v. WoodrumSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. People v. EaganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
  4. People v. ToddSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API