Legal Opinion

People v. Woodrum

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 20, 1996No. 95SA417PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

In this lawyer discipline proceeding, the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.18. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, including the recommendation of a public censure. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.

I

The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1992. The conditional admission states that on July 19, 1993, a client hired the respondent to represent her in a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
  2. People v. DohertySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  3. People v. EaganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. FieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. GilbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
  3. People v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  4. People v. BendinelliSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
  5. People v. YatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API