People v. Woodrum
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Per curiam
In this lawyer discipline proceeding, the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel entered into a stipulation, agreement, and conditional admission of misconduct pursuant to C.R.C.P. 241.18. An inquiry panel of the supreme court grievance committee approved the conditional admission, including the recommendation of a public censure. We accept the conditional admission and the inquiry panel’s recommendation.
I
The respondent was admitted to practice law in Colorado in 1992. The conditional admission states that on July 19, 1993, a client hired the respondent to represent her in a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SmithSupreme Court of Colorado · 1989
- People v. DohertySupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
- People v. EaganSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- People v. FieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
- People v. GilbertSupreme Court of Colorado · 2013
- People v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
- People v. BendinelliSupreme Court of Colorado · 2014
- People v. YatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998